Review

It is kind of the right time of year (if not the right time of the day) to review this year’s work so far.  In January I rewrote the course notes for the Bridging Course, which comes to 52 pages.  (Which reminds me that I must add it to my list of publications.)  My February paper was co-authored with Gideon (rejected, but soon to be revived), my March paper was stand-alone (published), my April paper was co-authored with Henri (not yet submitted, but that happens soon I hope).  My May and June papers will have to be the various drafts I wrote with Willem for our Impendulo project.  One was accepted as a short paper, but there were at least two others and a grant application.  In addition to the writing, there was a lot of experimental work. And I have reviewed about 15 papers and acted as external examinator for one course.  So I’m quite satisfied with my productivity.

But truth be told, I think I can double my output.  If I think of all the wasted time…ugh.  And the rest of the year will not be any easier.  I’m teaching 11 hours a week until the end of October (but with a two week break), so that means also at least 44 hours of preparation.  I’ll probably have to cut that down somewhat, but it is a pretty accurate average.  Hmm.  And I’ll have to tend to the unpublished papers.  I think it is going to be a tough four months before I can relax.

This entry was posted in work. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>